Beppe Grillo of the Movimento Cinque Stelle, at a press conference. |
Anyway I found the results with turnout figures by country at the Parliament's own website, and used them to construct the chart below, which cost me many hours and probably brain cells that could have been useful as I slouch toward senility, and probably still contains some serious errors:
Country | Turnout (%) | Left + Green | Liberal + Right | Nativist | Off the Continuum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belgium | 90 | 10 | 10 | 1 (Vlaams Belang) | 0 |
Luxembourg | 90 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Malta | 74.8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Italy | 60 | 34 | 22 | 5 (Lega Nord) | 17 (Comedians) |
Greece | 58 | 12 | 5 | 4 (Chrysi Avgi, Anel) | 0 |
Denmark | 56.4 | 5 | 4 | 4 (Dansk Folkeparti) | 0 |
Ireland | 51.6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Sweden | 48.8 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Germany | 47.9 | 43 | 38 | 8 (Alternative für Deutschland, NPD) | 0 |
Spain | 45.9 | 34 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
Austria | 45.7 | 8 | 6 | 4 (Österreichische Freiheitspartei) | 0 |
Lithuania | 44.9 | 3 | 6 | 2 (Order and Justice) | 0 |
Cyprus | 44 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
France | 43.5 | 23 | 27 | 24 (Front National) | 0 |
Finland | 40.9 | 4 | 4 | 3 (Finns Party) | 0 |
Netherlands | 37 | 7 | 13 | 8 (Party for Freedom, Christenunie) | 0 |
Estonia | 36.4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
United Kingdom | 36 | 23 | 20 | 24 (Ukip) | 0 |
Bulgaria | 35.5 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Portugal | 34.5 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 2 (monarchist Greens or worse) |
Romania | 32 | 17 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Latvia | 30 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Hungary | 28.9 | 6 | 12 | 3 (Jobbik) | 0 |
Croatia | 25 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Slovenia | 21 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 (believers in Eurovision) |
Czech Rep. | 19.5 | 7 | 13 | 1 (Svobodní) | 0 |
Slovakia | 13 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
This ranks the countries of the EU by voter turnout in these elections, from 90% for Belgium to a truly desperate 13% for Slovakia (still better, of course, than a school board election in the US) and then lays out the voting results in terms of number of seats won, broken down by tendency and my own dangerous arithmetic (that's where the errors would be).
("Liberal" means liberal in the 19th-century sense, like the English Liberal Democrats or German FDP; where it says "nativist" I originally had "fascist" but decided that was possibly a tad unfair.)
So, if you divide into three groups of nine countries each you find a pattern: out of the top nine countries (about 48% turnout and up), five or just about 56% were won decisively by the left; out of the next nine (36% to 46% turnout), three or 33% went left; and of the bottom nine (13% to 35.5%), two or 22% went left.
Or with an alternative model
- High turnout (above 50%) 4 out of 7 left (57%)
- Medium turnout (40 to 49%) 2 out of 8 left (25%)
- Low turnout (30 to 39%) 2 out of 7 left (28%)
- Very low turnout (below 30%) 0 out of 5 left (0%)
This is NOT AN ACTUAL STUDY (watch out, Brooksie! you can reknot your necktie now), which would need to consider the voting percentages rather than the number of seats and would best be done in conjunction with looks at the elections of 2004 and 2009; merely a little demo of how such a study could work. But it is pretty suggestive.
Update:
I'm not totally sure if I'm getting this right, by the way, but I think the Verjamem Party got its start when Eva Boto's song, the Slovenian entry at the 2012 Eurovision competition in Baku, lost, and angry Slovenes decided that all their current political parties were inadequate to right this injustice.