He was farther out than you thought, with a vengeance. From Christianist News Service (just kidding, Cybercast News Service) News:
Hold that analogy a second, I think it's trying to get away!Speaking from Capitol Hill on Friday morning after the lack of support for the plan, Boehner was asked, “What went wrong?”
He said, “Listen, there was a perception created that that vote last night was going to increase taxes. Now, I disagree with that characterization of the bill. But that impression was out there.”
“Now we had a number of our members who just really didn’t want to be perceived as having raised taxes,” he said. “That was the real issue.”
Boehner continued: “One of my colleagues the other night had an analogy of 100 people drowning in a pool and that he was the lifeguard. And because he couldn’t save any of them, does that mean he shouldn’t have done anything? And his point to them was, if I can go in there and save 99 people that are drowning, that’s what I should do as a lifeguard.”
“But the perception was out there, and a lot of our members did not want to have to deal with it,” he said.
 |
| Image from Swimming Pool Safety News. |
But what's the analogy to, actually? Who's in danger of figurative drowning? Because I hadn't heard of the proposals of Plan B being meant exactly to save anybody, unless, well, the Republican members of the House, whose failure to participate in finding a way around or over that fiscal declivity might bring about their figurative extinction.
Or are all the members really lifeguards? Are the potential drowning victims the figurative 99 taxes that are getting lowered against one that is also getting lowered but is getting the perception created that it is getting increased? Or is it really getting increased, and hence a drowning victim, and creating the perception that all of them are getting increased by synecdoche, creating the lifeguards' weary negativity?
Or am I just vainly trying to separate the sheep analogies from the goat analogies? Baaa.
